References and Further Reading 1. Applied Ethics as Distinct from Normative Ethics and Metaethics One way of categorizing the field of ethics as a study of morality is by distinguishing between its three branches, one of them being applied ethics.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. The fuel tank position has allowed the projecting bolts to puncture the tank when the vehicle was struck from the rear.
The Ford Motor Company The ford pinto case essay decided not to change the fuel tanks design location in order to reduce the production costs. Between the years of and the Ford Motor Company faced about 50 lawsuits in connection to the Ford Pinto collisions.
The obvious question is who is responsible or aware of the design flaws of the fuel tank placement. Furthermore what are the ethical dilemmas associated with this case study? I hope to determine whether Ford was to blame for Ford Pinto collision outcomes.
In order to understand the ethical dilemmas that are addressed within the Ford Pinto case, we must identify the people that have roles within the case. The Ford Motor Company would be one of the obvious stakeholders of the ethical decisions made.
Iacocca Executive Vice President made the decision to move on with the production of the Pinto because he felt the studies conducted under the supervision of Mr. Robert Alexander VP of Engineering were feasible. And it was later validated that the crash test results were forwarded up to the management.
Another stakeholder that may have had a strong influence on the decision made by the Ford management is the shareholders. As a shareholder you represent part ownership of the company. Shareholders could have made a financial influence on Mr.
What are the dilemmas posed from the cultural relativism? Does society view those actions taken by Ford Company acceptable?
The people have proven that truth is the best practice when conducting business, so therefore the truth is relative. In cultural relativism you must compare systems of law, politics and the beliefs within the environment. TINA was enacted for the purpose of providing full and fair disclosure by contractors in the conduct of negotiations with the Government.
Shareholders probably looked at the consequences of the decisions of the Ford management.
In doing so, their actions could be viewed as teleology. The shareholders took in account of the purpose of the decision or the end result.
Which result would benefit them the best? Everyone that was involved with the Ford Pinto dilemmas faced deontological ethics. They would have been faced with the question of, are my actions moral and is it my obligation to make the right decision.
We are all faced with this decision on a daily basis. Researchers at Cornell have found that people make an average of In conclusion, I believe that the Ford management did not make the right decision simply based on the ethical category definitions.
Teleology simply states that you will look at the consequences and whether you are acting for the greater good. And staying true to cultural relativism Ford was not acting for the great of good, because you can never place a price on a human life. Ford demonstrated to society what is not acceptable culturally or legally.
Ford can prevent further ethical violations or clarify dilemmas by having multiple levels that a decision similar to the Pinto case should have to process through. Included within the levels, should include legal services or even more specific and Ethics Lawyer.
Money should never trump a human life.Gmail is email that's intuitive, efficient, and useful. 15 GB of storage, less spam, and mobile access. Essay on The Ford Pinto Case Words | 4 Pages.
Business Case (The Ford Pinto) There was strong competition for Ford in the American small-car market from Volkswagen and several Japanese companies in the 's. In the near future, a large volume of electric vehicle (EV) batteries will reach their end-of-life in EVs.
However, they may still retain capacity that could be used in a second life, e.g., for a second use in an EV, or for home electricity storage, thus becoming part .
Many parties were affected is this case including the Ford Motor Company employees, the shareholders, the company owners, and every single consumer or person who not only purchased the vehicles but also drove in them including the ones who were injured, burned or even killed, and not to be forgotten, the rest of the whole world.
This opened the door to further lawsuits. Although, Ford Company paid the victims and the heft fines imposed on them, they knew that if found of homicide then the company might be taken out of the market place (Ford Pinto Case 2).
Ageism (also spelled "agism") is stereotyping of and discrimination against individuals or groups on the basis of their age. This may be casual or systematic. The term was coined in by Robert Neil Butler to describe discrimination against seniors, and patterned on sexism and racism.
Butler defined "ageism" as a combination of three connected elements.